Tag: seo keywords

  • AI Search: How to Create Content That Is Actually Indexed and Useful

    AI Search: How to Create Content That Is Actually Indexed and Useful

    In the era of mass AI video generation and other types of content, many companies face a problem: their new pages, created specifically to improve visibility in AI search, are not being indexed and are not bringing the expected results. Why does this happen, and how can one build an effective workflow for AI video for advertising and other formats? The answer lies in understanding not just content gaps, but solution gaps.

    The Problem of “Content Parity” in AI Search

    One client found that their new pages, created for AI search, were not being indexed by Google. The team followed all recommendations: analyzed AI responses, studied competitors, identified gaps, and created more comprehensive content. However, in Google Search Console, these pages had the status “Crawled – currently not indexed.”

    “Indexing takes time,” said the SEO consultant, but a month had already passed.

    The problem lay in what is called “content parity.” The content was high-quality and well-organized, but it merely repeated existing information without adding anything new. This did not lead to information gain, which AI values so much.

    Differences Between Information Gain and Competitive Gaps

    • Competitive gaps: This is what you lack but your competitors have. Filling these gaps is important, but not always sufficient for information gain.
    • Information gain: This is new, unique information that helps the user or AI make a decision.

    Solution Gaps: The Key to Effective Content

    Instead of simply filling competitive gaps, it is necessary to focus on solution gaps. This is information that the user or LLM needs to make a decision, but which neither you nor your competitors have.

    Example: “Best Family Resort in Cancun”

    The query “What is the best all-inclusive family resort on the beach in Cancun?” is not just a set of keywords. It is a request for a decision. The AI system must evaluate criteria: “all-inclusive,” “family,” “on the beach.”

    “All-inclusive”: Not as Simple as It Seems

    The definition of “all-inclusive” is often vague. Marketing is great at selling a promise but poor at defining boundaries. For example, one resort states in its FAQ that the package includes accommodation, meals, drinks, sports, entertainment, and children’s programs, but excursions and spa treatments may be at an additional cost.

    Another resort dedicates an entire page to “all-inclusive” services, but a precise definition of what exactly is included is hard to find.

    The problem is not the lack of content, but that it doesn’t fully resolve the criteria. The user or AI has to piece together the definition to understand where “all-inclusive” ends and “additional costs” begin.

    “Family-friendly”: what lies behind the beautiful words

    A similar situation applies to “family-friendly.” A resort may have an excellent section for children and families, but the description of the program for teenagers aged 14-17 might be too general. A parent wants to know specifics: is it supervised childcare or optional activities? What are the operating hours? What activities are offered? Do teenagers leave the premises? What level of supervision is provided? These questions remain unanswered.

    Content analysis tools might show that the resort has “strong thematic coverage” for teen programs. But a parent doesn’t evaluate content architecture; they make a decision that will meet their family’s needs.

    A new approach to content creation: from criteria to knowledge

    To create content that is truly indexed and useful, we need to change our approach. Instead of simply generating content, we must:

    AI search: How to create content that is truly indexed and useful — illustration 2
    1. Define the client’s solution: What is the client or LLM trying to solve?
    2. Identify solution criteria: What criteria are important for making this decision?
    3. Find existing evidence: Where is the information that supports these criteria?
    4. Discover gaps in evidence: What information is missing?
    5. Qualify the gaps: Is it a knowledge gap, information fragmentation, or intentional omission?
    6. Acquire knowledge: If information is missing, how can it be obtained?
    7. Validate: Check the accuracy and completeness of the information.
    8. Create content: Using AI, transform knowledge into content.

    Where to get new knowledge?

    AI can analyze thousands of pages, but it cannot “produce” an organizational fact. If the policy for supervising a teen program is not documented, the model will not know it. If no one has measured the actual distance from the room to the beach, AI will not create that knowledge.

    Answers can be found in:

    • Support tickets
    • Call center transcripts
    • Internal site search queries
    • CRM records
    • Product documentation
    • Surveys
    • Training materials
    • The minds of expert employees

    Sometimes even Reddit, reviews, forums, and other communities where people discuss details that companies miss are useful. For example, a resort describes itself as “family-friendly,” and a frustrated parent explains what happened when they tried to enroll a three-year-old in the kids’ club.

    AI and the Future of Content

    AI has significantly reduced the cost of converting knowledge into content. Now, subscription-based neuro-production or an AI pipeline generating 500 videos per day have become a reality. However, this does not negate the need for knowledge acquisition. Text-to-video generation or mass generation APIs do not create facts; they merely process existing data.

    The advantage shifts up the chain: to a better understanding of customer decisions, identifying criteria that others have missed, uncovering operational knowledge hidden within the organization, connecting it to your products and experience, and validating the answer before publication. This is not just about creating AI commercials or AI UGC for a crypto project; it’s about creating value.

    Sometimes this means analyzing queries, sometimes listening to support calls, sometimes discovering that Reddit users are answering a question the company never addressed. And sometimes it means something that seems old-fashioned: talking to an expert and gaining new knowledge.

    AI can help us identify gaps, organize evidence, and transform acquired knowledge into useful content. But for true informational gain, there must always be something new to acquire.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is “content parity” and why is it harmful for SEO?

    Content parity is the creation of content that almost completely duplicates information already available from competitors or other sources. It is harmful for SEO because search engines, especially AI search, look for unique, valuable, and new information (informational gain) that helps the user make a decision, rather than simply copying what has already been said. Such content is often not indexed or ranks poorly.

    How can AI help in creating content that brings informational gain?

    AI can significantly speed up many stages of content creation: from competitor analysis and identifying existing gaps to organizing evidence and transforming knowledge into content. However, AI cannot independently create new, unique knowledge. It is a powerful tool for processing and structuring information, but human input in the form of research, expert knowledge, and understanding user needs remains critically important for achieving informational gain.

    In what way do competitive gaps and solution gaps differ?

    Competitive gaps are areas of content where your competitors have information, but you don’t. Filling these gaps helps you catch up with competitors. Solution gaps are information that a user (or AI) needs to make an important decision, but which neither you nor your competitors have, or it is fragmented and incomplete. Focusing on solution gaps allows you to create truly valuable and unique content.

    Master new approaches to content creation so that your AI avatar with subtitles or AI face-swap clips not only generate videos but also provide real value. Discover how neural networks write scripts and edit, while you focus on the main thing – knowledge. Find out how much one AI creative costs or the cost of 1 minute of AI video, and how to maximize ROI by creating content that truly solves customer problems.

  • Is CPM profitable? Should Perplexity be excluded from AI visibility tracking?

    Is CPM profitable? Should Perplexity be excluded from AI visibility tracking?

    In the world of AI search, leaders are constantly changing, and the question of which platforms to track becomes critical for SEO specialists. Recent discussions have revolved around the Perplexity platform: should we continue monitoring it or focus exclusively on giants like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude? We will examine how changes in market share affect visibility assessment and how much money each spent ruble will bring to understand if CPM is profitable.

    Is Perplexity really losing ground?

    Ross Hudgens, CEO of Siege Media, claims that Perplexity’s market share is shrinking. Including it in general metrics alongside ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Google AI products can distort the real picture of visibility. Hudgens urges: “Everyone should remove Perplexity from their LLM trackers today.”

    However, as experience shows, hasty conclusions can be erroneous. In March 2002, at the Search Engine Strategies conference, the reduction of tracked search engines from 15 to 5 was discussed. Google was then excluded from the list. This turned out to be a serious oversight, as Google was rapidly gaining momentum. A similar situation could repeat itself today.

    Data confirms Perplexity’s decline

    • According to StatCounter, in June 2026, Perplexity held 7.91% of AI chatbot referral share, almost on par with Gemini (7.94%).
    • By August 2026, Perplexity’s share had fallen to 4.31%, while Gemini grew to 10.9%.

    “A small market share does not always mean small strategic importance. It’s like investing in stocks: you shouldn’t always look only at current capitalization, but also at growth potential.”

    The market is consolidating, but not around a single leader

    The latest Similarweb data for May 2026 shows the dominance of ChatGPT (53.9% of global web visits among seven major AI assistants). Gemini accounts for 27.9%, Claude – 9.2%, DeepSeek – 4.1%, Grok – 2.4%, and Perplexity and Copilot – 1.3% each.

    Significant changes occurred not in the disappearance of Perplexity, but in the emergence of a strong second player. ChatGPT’s share of AI chatbot web traffic decreased from 76.4% a year ago to 52.7% in May 2026. Gemini grew from 9% to 27.3%, and Claude – from 1.6% to 8.9%.

    Key players and their advantages

    • ChatGPT: over 900 million weekly active users (February), over 1 billion active users across all products (end of July). This is a huge direct consumer base.
  • Gemini: The Gemini app exceeded 1 billion monthly users (August). It has Google distribution through Search, Android, and the entire product ecosystem.
  • Claude: Has gained a strong position in the enterprise segment and among developers. In April, over 100,000 customers used Claude on Amazon Bedrock. Annual revenue exceeded $65 billion (August).

These are not three versions of the same business, but three different distribution advantages. The market looks like an emerging oligopoly, not a “winner takes all” situation.

What SEOs Should Track

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode should not be viewed as ordinary LLMs. They are much more important. In June, Google reported that AI Overviews cover more than 2.5 billion users per month, and AI Mode exceeded 1 billion monthly users. AI Mode queries have doubled every quarter since launch.

According to Similarweb, AI Overviews appeared in 43% of Google search queries in the US by May 2026, compared to 15% a year earlier. AI Mode visits grew from 126 million in June 2025 to 279 million in May 2026.

This means that Google AI is a separate layer in the world’s dominant search ecosystem. For B2B companies, Claude is also of immense importance, despite relatively low consumer traffic. PwC, TCS, and Cognizant are actively integrating Claude into their workflows, training tens of thousands of employees. Over 1,000 business customers spend more than $1 million annually on Claude.

Three-Tier AI Visibility Measurement System

  1. First Tier: Platforms with scale and strategic importance. Track ChatGPT and Gemini separately. Add Claude for B2B, corporate, and professional audiences.
  2. Second Tier: AI search embedded in existing ecosystems. Track Google AI Overviews and AI Mode separately from ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. The goal is to measure how AI changes the search journey. Microsoft Copilot can also be included in this tier if the company has a significant presence in Microsoft 365.
  3. Third Tier: Emerging or specialized platforms. This includes Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek. Do not ignore them, but do not give them equal weight. Monitor them for unusual visibility, referral traffic, citations, and growth.

Don’t Let Averages Mask Real Data

An aggregated LLM visibility metric can create a false sense of accuracy. For example, if a brand has 40% citation rate in ChatGPT, 35% in Gemini, 30% in Claude, and 90% in Perplexity, a simple average would be 48.75%. This number says little if Perplexity accounts for only a small fraction of the traffic important to the business.

CPM выгодный? Стоит ли исключать Perplexity из отслеживания ИИ-видимости? — illustration 2

Instead of asking, “What is our average LLM visibility?” you should ask, “Where do the people important to this business actually encounter our brand?”

This requires combining three data sets:

  • Audience Reach: usage, visits, platform distribution.
  • Visibility: mentions, citations, referring URLs, queries that generate them.
  • Business Impact: linking AI referrals to engagement, leads, sales, and other conversions.

My Verdict on Perplexity

Ross Hudgens is right about the problem, but not entirely right about the solution. Don’t remove Perplexity from your LLM tracker, but reduce its weight. If Perplexity generates 1% of your AI traffic, giving it 25% or 33% weight in your visibility score is unjustified. However, if it accounts for more than 5% of referrals, as Hudgens himself suggests, the argument for it becomes stronger.

Perplexity’s trajectory is worth watching. Similarweb’s August 2026 analysis still describes Perplexity as an active player in the AI search market, noting its ad-free strategy and focus on subscriptions and enterprise deals. This shows why “small” and “insignificant” are not synonyms.

Frequently Asked Questions

What CPM should be considered profitable for AI platforms?

Profitable CPM in AI platforms depends on your target audience and ROI. If a platform generates high-quality leads or sales, even with a relatively high CPM, it can be profitable. The main thing is to consider not only the cost per impression but also the conversion rate.

Is it worth testing hypotheses cheaply on new AI platforms?

Yes, cheap hypothesis testing on new AI platforms is essential. This is how you can discover the next Google. You shouldn’t spend huge budgets on them, but monitoring and minimal testing will allow you not to miss a potential breakthrough.

What is cheaper: a banner or a blogger, when compared to AI platforms?

The question of what is cheaper, a banner or a blogger, is incorrect in the context of AI. AI platforms offer a different type of interaction. Price comparison should be done through efficiency metrics: how much does 1 million impressions via a banner cost versus the cost of generating 100 AI videos or the cost of publishing 500 videos via AI tools. Each channel has its own unit economics.

How to estimate the cost of uniqueizing one video using AI?

The cost of uniqueizing one video using AI depends on the complexity of the task and the tool used. It is important to evaluate not only direct costs but also the time that AI will save. The price per minute of AI video with an avatar also varies, but it often turns out to be more profitable than manual labor, especially for large volumes.

Conclusion

The AI search market is dynamic. Ignoring Perplexity or other niche platforms entirely means risking missing important signals. However, blindly giving them equal weight with giants distorts the picture. A mathematical approach to analysis, weighing platforms by their real business impact, and constant monitoring of new players are key to success in SEO and a profitable CPM strategy.

We count cash, not just the number of platforms in the tracker. Don’t overlook the outsiders who are gaining momentum. Perhaps among them lies the next market leader. Start analyzing your data today so you don’t miss new opportunities!

  • AI Changes Search: Why Your Content Needs to Provide an Immediate Answer

    AI Changes Search: Why Your Content Needs to Provide an Immediate Answer

    The era of fragmented queries is fading. Data from a year of Google’s AI search mode shows: users are asking complete questions, not fragments of phrases. This is critically important for stream highlights and any other content: now the main information should be at the beginning so that AI algorithms can instantly extract it and present it in their reviews. If you bury the essence in long introductions, your content risks going unnoticed.

    Evolution of Search: From Keywords to Dialogue

    Since the launch of AI mode, user queries have fundamentally changed. According to Shivani Mohan, Google’s VP of Data Science, AI mode has reached 1 billion active users per month. But it’s not just about the increase in the number of queries.

    • Query length has tripled: The average query in AI mode in the US is three times longer than traditional queries.
    • Multimodal search: More than 1 in 6 queries now include images, voice input, or interactive dialogue.
    • Growth of images: Image-based queries are growing by 40% monthly.
    • Follow-up questions: Users ask clarifying questions, indicating the depth of their search.

    The most common first words in AI mode queries are “what,” “how,” “I,” “is,” and “can.” This demonstrates a shift from searching by individual words to task- and question-oriented search, similar to communicating with a human.

    Five User Behavior Modes in AI Search

    Mohan identifies five main user behavior modes, each requiring a specific approach to content:

    • Explore: Open-ended queries for brainstorming. Growing 30% faster than overall AI mode traffic.
    • Decide: Queries with comparison words (“which of,” “which one”). Growing 40% faster.
    • Learn: Understanding new concepts and professional development.
    • Create: Queries for image creation have tripled since the beginning of the year.
    • Do: Planning (workouts, travel, budgets). Growing 80% faster in the last six months.

    “This is not just a change in ranking factors; it’s a transformation of user behavior. If you’re still building content around keywords, that model is rapidly becoming obsolete,” says Greg Jarboe.

    How to adapt your content strategy for AI search

    To make your content effective in the new reality of AI search, follow these five steps:

    1. Start with the main point

    Place the main definition, key metrics, or main conclusions directly in the first sentence of each main section. This allows AI algorithms to quickly extract the necessary information.

    2. Use specifics

    Formulate sentences with specific brand names, geographical markers, exact dates, and verified numerical values. Avoid vague generalizations so that your text is “mathematically readable” for search engines and reduces the risk of AI “hallucinations.”

    3. Structure for scanning

    Organize the main text into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences). After section headings, use brief summaries, ordered lists, or structured tables. This facilitates segment extraction for AI and ensures readability for humans. This is especially important for mass cutting of 100+ clips, where each fragment must be self-contained and informative.

    AI is changing search: Why your content should provide an answer immediately — illustration 2

    4. Prepare answers to follow-up questions

    If multi-turn dialogues are growing by 40% per month, your content should answer the second and third questions a reader will ask after the first. Structure long content so that each section can serve as an answer to a specific follow-up question. This increases the likelihood that this particular “chunk” will be provided by the AI mode. For cutting game streams, this means creating clips that answer specific viewer questions.

    5. Optimize multimodal content

    With the growth of image queries (40% monthly) and a threefold increase in image creation requests, alt-text, image context, and visual content quality are becoming key ranking factors. They are no longer secondary but are part of what the AI mode reads.

    Conclusion: From “assembly line” to “smart content production”

    Success in modern SEO is not about flooding the internet with templated texts, but about mastering structural clarity that provides immediate and verified benefits to both algorithms and readers. Just as 19th-century journalists adapted to the telegraph, we must rethink our approach to content creation for the AI era. Cutting streams without losing quality, creating highlights, and cropping 9:16 from horizontal — all this requires not just technical skills, but also a strategic approach to information delivery. Remember that the person who cuts streams must now think like an SEO specialist so that every Twitch clipping or podcast video cutting works as effectively as possible to attract an audience. Contact us to find out how we can help you with this.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How long does it take to cut a 2-hour stream?

    The cutting time depends on the complexity of the content and the desired number of highlights. On average, professional cutting without loss of quality of a 2-hour stream into 5-10 clips can take from 1 to 3 hours, including adding subtitles for cuts and optimization. If you need bulk cutting of 100+ clips, automated tools such as Opus Clip analog service are used, which significantly speed up the process but require subsequent manual refinement.

    What moments are usually cut from streams for highlights?

    For highlight editing, the most emotional moments, key game events (e.g., “kills”, “win rates”), funny jokes, important announcements, Q&A sessions, and fragments that evoke a strong audience reaction are usually cut. The goal is to create cuts for TikTok from Twitch or YouTube that quickly grab attention.

    Are subtitles needed for stream cuts?

    Yes, subtitles for cuts are extremely important. They improve content accessibility, allow videos to be watched without sound (e.g., in public places), and increase engagement. In addition, subtitles contribute to better indexing of content by search engines, which is important for stream monetization through cuts.

    What is the price for 1 hour of stream for cutting 20 clips?

    The price for cutting 20 clips from a stream for 1 hour can vary depending on the specialist’s qualifications, the complexity of the editing, and the need to add graphics and subtitles. Approximately, the cost can range from 1000 to 3000 rubles per hour of source material, if it is a high-quality work taking into account SEO optimization and 9:16 cropping from horizontal for different platforms.