Tag: dies on short videos

  • Best Channels for Cheap CPM in Brand Awareness Campaigns

    Best Channels for Cheap CPM in Brand Awareness Campaigns

    Looking for the cheapest CPM for a large-scale brand awareness campaign in 2026? We’ve compiled a rating of channels where you can buy thousands of impressions at a minimal price without losing audience quality. From banners on short videos to niche podcasts — we break down where you can really save money and where a low price results in empty numbers.

    Channels with cheap CPM are advertising surfaces where a company can buy a thousand impressions at a low price while maintaining acceptable audience quality. In 2026, one of the cheapest options is banners on short videos. In the CIS, the price can be around $0.03–$0.10 per thousand impressions, or roughly $35–$100 per million impressions.

    The lowest price alone does not guarantee a good result. For a brand awareness campaign, it’s important that impressions are real, videos are not duplicated, suspicious publications are filtered out, and the company receives a clear report.

    According to ARIR and Data Insight, interactive advertising has become the main market driver: study participants predicted its share in companies’ advertising spending at 56% in 2025, and also noted growing interest in new formats, algorithmic purchasing, advertising with creators, and video advertising.

    Rating Methodology

    The channels below are ranked based on three criteria:

    Criterion What It Means
    Price Cost per thousand and million impressions
    Scale Whether large reach can be purchased quickly
    Quality Control Whether there is protection against fraud, duplicates, and inappropriate context

    Important: the prices below are working benchmarks, not a universal price list. The final cost depends on the country, topic, language, placement requirements, budget size, and verification quality.

    Channel #1. Banners on Short Videos

    Banners on short videos are the strongest channel for cheap mass reach. The format is simple: a banner with the company’s message is placed on a large number of short videos.

    For the CIS, a working benchmark is approximately $0.03–$0.10 per thousand impressions, or $35–$100 per million impressions. A more common range for regular campaigns is $35–$60/70 per million impressions. For the US, the price is higher: roughly $200–$500 per million impressions.

    Where the Format Works Best

    • movie and TV show clips;
    • short facts;
    • memes;
    • educational videos;
    • entertainment compilations;
    • explainer videos;
    • light content for quick viewing.

    Why the Price Is Low

    • no need to shoot a video;
    • one banner is used multiple times;
  • placement is done across multiple publications;
  • topics can be changed quickly;
  • tests can be launched with a small budget;
  • there is no need to pay each author separately.

The main condition is quality control. At iBV, publications are automatically scanned, the system identifies suspicious behavior patterns, blocks suspicious videos, and helps avoid paying for inflated views. Without such verification, a cheap CPM can be a nice but useless number.

For gaming companies, the price is usually about 30% higher because more control is needed: age restrictions, exclusion of controversial topics, environment verification, and risk reduction for the advertiser.

Illustration 1

Channel #2. Inexpensive Internet TV

Internet TV is advertising in video services and apps where people watch content on a TV, phone, or computer. The cheap tier is usually not in the most premium shows or major sports, but in a broader video catalog, niche apps, and less expensive packages.

Pros

  • similar to television in perception;
  • the large screen increases visibility;
  • frequency can be controlled;
  • can be purchased more flexibly than classic TV;
  • suitable for companies that need “video weight” but don’t want to pay for a full TV plan.

Cons

  • more expensive than banners on short videos;
  • a video version of the ad is required;
  • reporting is not always transparent enough;
  • the quality of placements needs to be checked separately.

IAB’s 2025 report noted growing expectations for connected TV: buyers expected 47% of such ad inventory to be available for more flexible purchasing, and 74% had already created or planned to create internal teams to work with this channel.

Channel #3. In-Game Advertising

In-game advertising can be a cheap and powerful channel, especially for a young audience. It comes in different forms: video ads for rewards, in-game interface placements, images within the game world, and sponsored placements.

Pros

  • high engagement;
  • young audience;
  • lots of mobile traffic;
  • a good option for gaming and entertainment companies;
  • undervalued placements can be found.

Cons

  • not every company fits the gaming environment;
  • higher risk of user irritation;
  • careful presentation is required;
  • for gaming companies, the price may be higher and verification stricter.

In-game advertising is good when a company wants to reach a young audience but doesn’t want to be completely dependent on social networks.

Channel #4. Podcasts and Inexpensive Author Shows

Podcasts rarely offer the cheapest CPM in absolute terms, but they can be profitable due to trust. This is especially true if you choose not the most expensive hosts, but medium and small shows with a clear audience.

Лучшие каналы для дешёвого CPM в кампаниях на узнаваемость — illustration 2
Illustration 2

Pros

  • trust in the host;
  • clear topic;
  • good engagement;
  • can choose a niche;
  • suitable for complex products.

Cons

  • reach is smaller than short videos;
  • not always an accurate estimate of views or listens;
  • no visual contact if it is audio only;
  • harder to scale quickly.

Podcasts are best used not as the cheapest mass channel, but as an addition to reach: for trust, explanation, and reinforcing the message.

Channel #5. Digital Out-of-Home Advertising

Digital out-of-home advertising is screens in the city, shopping malls, transport, on streets, and in buildings. It does not always provide the cheapest CPM, but works well for local awareness.

Pros

  • physical presence;
  • visible in the city;
  • suitable for stores, events, restaurants, services;
  • perceived as serious;
  • can be launched by city and district.

Cons

  • harder to measure exact contact;
  • price is higher than short video banners;
  • cannot quickly verify each user impression;
  • message must be very short.

Digital out-of-home advertising is suitable when it is important for a company to be seen in a specific city or district.

Channel #6. Niche Video Apps

These are video apps and small video services where ads are shown on thematic content. Such a channel can be cheaper than large video platforms because competition is lower.

Pros

  • can find inexpensive video traffic;
  • audience is often thematic;
  • suitable for testing;
  • sometimes provides good reach on a large screen.

Cons

  • need to check the list of apps;
  • possible duplicates and questionable impressions;
  • audience is not always clear;
  • requires strong reporting on placements.

This channel is best used only where there is transparency: list of platforms, quality checks, impression reports, and the ability to exclude unsuitable apps.

Illustration 3

Channel #7. Paid Social Media Advertising

Paid social media advertising remains an important channel for awareness. It is not always the cheapest, but it is convenient for launching, testing materials, and quick comparison.

Pros

  • quick launch;
  • clear dashboards;
  • wide reach;
  • ability to test different messages;
  • familiar reporting.
  • Cons

    • price increases with narrow targeting;
    • high competition;
    • banners and videos quickly become annoying;
    • some reporting remains within the platform;
    • not always convenient to compare with other channels.

    Social networks are good to use as a control point. If short video banners provide cheaper reach with normal quality checks, they can be scaled. If social networks give a better response at a higher price, they remain in the plan.

    How to Build a Channel Mix

    For a low-cost awareness campaign, you can use the following structure:

    Budget Share Channel Objective
    50–60% Short video banners The cheapest mass reach
    15–20% Paid social media advertising Message testing and comparison
    10–15% Low-cost internet TV Video weight and big screen
    5–10% Podcasts or branded shows Trust and explanation
    5–10% Verification and reporting Quality control and insights

    If the budget is small, you can start with just short video banners and social networks. For the first test of banners, a budget of at least $500 is enough to check price, reach, engagement, dynamics, and report quality.

    FAQ

    What is the cheapest CPM in 2026? For short video banners in the CIS, a working benchmark can be around $0.03–0.10 per thousand impressions. In terms of one million impressions, this is approximately $35–100, with a common range of $35–60/70 depending on the brief. For the US, the price of banner advertising on short videos is usually higher: $200–500 per million impressions.

    Illustration 4

    Is the cheapest CPM always the best option? No. The lowest price is only good with normal verification. You need to filter out duplicate videos, suspicious publications, and bot traffic. Without this, a cheap CPM may mean not cheap reach, but poor quality.

    Why do gaming companies pay more? For gaming companies, the price is often about 30% higher because the category has more risks: age restrictions, sensitivity to context, controversial genres, potential advertiser restrictions, and the need for stricter publication verification.

    What type of content is best for placing banners? Most often, short videos for easy consumption are suitable: movie and TV clips, educational facts, memes, educational videos, explainer videos, and entertainment compilations. Such content provides large volume and is well suited for cheap reach.

    Ready to launch a campaign with minimal CPM? Start by testing banners on short videos — this is the fastest and most budget-friendly way to test a hypothesis. And if you need help with setup and quality control, reach out to the professionals.

  • Why Advertising in Viral Videos Is Cheaper Than TV

    Why Advertising in Viral Videos Is Cheaper Than TV

    Why Advertising in Viral Videos Is Cheaper Than TV: A Breakdown for Marketers

    A breakdown for marketing teams: why overlays on short videos can be cheaper than television, how much a million impressions cost in the CIS and the US, and when TV is still necessary. Advertising in viral short videos can deliver reach noticeably cheaper than television, because placements are distributed across many videos, the banner is reused, and impressions can be quickly reallocated between topics, countries, and languages.

    Television sells airtime slots and requires expensive production. Overlays on short videos allow you to buy millions of impressions without shooting a separate TV commercial.

    This does not mean television is no longer needed. TV remains a strong channel for sports, major launches, older audiences, and national reach. But if the goal is to buy a very large number of impressions for minimal money, overlays on short videos are often cheaper.

    MAGNA, in its summer 2025 forecast, estimated global advertising revenue at $979 billion, while expecting a 3% decline in traditional channel revenues—including television, radio, print, and outdoor advertising—and an 8% growth for digital players. It also noted growth in advertising sales on social networks and short video platforms.

    What Makes Up the Price of Television

    Television advertising seems simple only from the outside: shoot a commercial, buy airtime, get reach. In practice, the price consists of several layers.

    Expense What It Includes How It Affects the Final Price
    Production Shooting, crew, actors, editing, sound, rights Increases the price even before airing
    Airtime Channel, time, program, season The more prestigious the slot, the more expensive
    Planning Selecting channels and schedules Adds separate costs
    Approvals Revisions, legal review, adaptations Increases timelines and costs
    Non-target audience People who don’t need the ad Makes the desired contact more expensive

    Television has a strong side: it creates a sense of scale. If a company goes on a major broadcast, it can be perceived as a sign of reliability. But in terms of cost per desired contact, TV often loses to short videos, especially when the audience is younger, more mobile, and more often watches content on their phone.

    What Makes Up the Price of Overlays on Short Videos

    Overlays on short videos have a different economy.

    Expense What It Includes Why It’s Cheaper
    Banner Simple overlay with logo and message No need to shoot a video
    Placement Many short videos One banner works on thousands of videos
    Verification Filtering out duplicates and suspicious publications Helps avoid paying for junk impressions
    Reporting Impressions, reach, engagement, trends Results can be quickly understood
    Adjustment Replacing the banner or topics Faster than changing a TV commercial

    For the CIS, the price can start from about $35 per million impressions and go up to $60–70 per million impressions and higher. For the US, banner advertising on short videos is usually more expensive: roughly $200–500 per million impressions. Even the US range can be lower than television reach, when considering production, agency fees, and non-targeted impressions.

    For gaming companies, the price is often about 30% higher because additional restrictions are needed: age limits, environment checks, exclusion of controversial topics, and more careful advertiser protection.

    Why Plaques Are Cheaper Than Television

    There are four reasons.

    1. No need to shoot a video

    A television commercial requires production. A plaque requires a banner. The difference in costs is enormous.

    2. One banner works on many videos

    A plaque can be used on movie and TV clips, educational facts, memes, educational videos, and other short videos for easy consumption.

    3. Placement can be quickly changed

    If one topic yields weak results, it can be excluded. If another type of video provides good reach, the budget can be shifted there.

    4. The price is based on actual impressions

    In TV, a company often buys a slot and a projected audience. In short videos, it’s easier to track actual impressions, dynamics, and engagement.

    Illustration 1

    Do Short Videos Reach the Same Audience as TV?

    Partially — yes. Completely — no. And that’s normal.

    Television is stronger where the following are important:

    • older audience;
    • major sports events;
    • federal scale;
    • habit of watching live broadcasts;
    • trust in major channels.

    Short videos are stronger where the following are important:

    • young and middle-aged audience;
    • fast reach on mobile;
    • cheap millions of impressions;
    • frequent reminders about the company;
    • different languages and countries;
    • quick banner changes.

    WARC, in its Future of Media 2025 review, writes that channel diversity offers companies new growth opportunities, and investments are shifting toward creators, social networks, podcasts, and games. This confirms a general shift: companies are increasingly building a mixed plan where television does not necessarily disappear, but part of the budget goes to more flexible and cheaper channels.

    How to Compare TV and Short Video Reporting

    Television and short videos have different evaluation methods.

    Television Plaques on Short Videos
    Audience estimation via panels Actual impressions in the report
    Broadcast schedule List of topics and publications
    High production cost Low banner cost
    Harder to change campaign after launch Can replace banner faster
    Strong scale effect Cheap repeat contact

    For management, it’s better to compare not clicks but more understandable metrics:

    Почему реклама в вирусных видео дешевле ТВ — illustration 2
    Illustration 2
    • how much a million impressions cost;
  • how many people saw the ad;
  • how often they saw it;
  • what the engagement was;
  • which publications were excluded;
  • whether there was positive viewership growth;
  • how much production cost.
  • The IAB notes that video ad buyers are increasingly focusing on business outcomes, not just the placement itself. The 2025 report also indicates that buyers expect more management and reporting capabilities from video platforms.

    Placement Safety: Where Risks Are Higher

    For television, safety is simpler. There are fewer channels, the environment is clearer, and editorial control is stronger. Therefore, for some companies, TV remains a safe option.

    Short videos carry more risks: many creators, rapidly changing content, repeated clips, inflated metrics, and controversial topics. But these risks can be managed.

    In iBV, the system automatically scans publications and blocks those showing suspicious behavioral signs: unnatural view growth, duplicates, strange ratios of impressions to engagement, and recurring patterns. This is especially important for cheap reach: if junk publications are not filtered out, a low cost per million impressions becomes meaningless.

    A worrying sign is the absence of a clear system for tracking video duplicates and combating inflated metrics based on automated algorithms. If a provider cannot explain how it blocks suspicious publications, comparing its price to television is incorrect.

    When Television Still Wins

    Television is worth buying when the goal is not just cheap reach.

    Sports and Live Broadcasts

    Major sports events create a shared moment effect. Short videos can enhance a campaign but do not always replace the live broadcast itself.

    Illustration 3

    Older Audiences

    If a company’s core audience is older and watches a lot of TV, television advertising may be justified.

    Large National Launches

    When it is important to show scale, TV can serve as a signal of seriousness.

    Categories with Strict Approvals

    Sometimes companies find it easier to control one TV spot than multiple online placements.

    Premium Perception

    For some products, a large screen and familiar broadcast create the desired status.

    The correct conclusion is not that television is “worse.” It is simply more expensive and less flexible. Short video banners are better suited for cheap mass reach, especially when you need to quickly buy millions of impressions and see a quality report.

    How to Decide on Shifting Part of the TV Budget

    Instead of a complex weekly model, it is enough to go through a short list of questions.

    Illustration 4
    Question What to Look At
    How much does a million impressions on TV cost, including production? Total price, not just airtime
    How much does a million impressions in short videos cost? CIS: $35–70+; USA: $200–500
    Is a TV audience specifically needed? Age, geography, viewing habits
    Can a banner be used instead of a video? If yes, the cost is drastically lower
    Is there verification for duplicates and inflated metrics? Without it, cheap reach is risky
    Is a quick message replacement needed? This is easier with short videos
    Is there a risk to the company? Especially important for games and regulated categories

    If a company wants to maintain the effect of scale, it can keep TV for major moments and use short video banners for cheap additional reach.

    FAQ

    Can advertising in short videos reach the same audience as TV? Partially yes. Short videos work well with mobile audiences, young viewers, and people who often watch light content: movie and TV clips, memes, facts, educational videos. But TV is still stronger for older audiences, sports, and major live broadcasts.

    Is the reporting of short videos comparable to TV? It is comparable in terms of reach, cost per impression, frequency, and overall effect, but it is not the same. TV relies on television viewership estimates, while short videos provide reports on actual impressions, engagement, dynamics, and excluded publications.

    When is it still worth buying television? TV is worth buying for sports, national launches, older audiences, premium perception, and situations where the very fact of being on air matters. If the goal is the cheapest mass reach, banners on short videos are often more cost-effective.

    Why are banners on short videos cheaper? Because there is no need to shoot a video, one banner works across many videos, and placement can be quickly redistributed among topics. For the CIS, the price can be around $35–70+ per million impressions, for the USA — around $200–500 per million.

    Conclusion

    Advertising in viral videos is not a replacement for television, but a tool for cheap mass reach. If your goal is to buy millions of impressions without the cost of producing a video and with the ability to quickly adjust, banners on short videos are your choice. Analyze your budget, ask the questions from the checklist above, and start testing this channel today.