Tag: ai content creation

  • Google is Hiring Engineers to Create AI Content in Discover

    Google is Hiring Engineers to Create AI Content in Discover

    Google is opening new horizons in the world of personalized content by hiring engineers to develop and implement artificial intelligence into its Discover service. This strategic decision aims to create a dynamic, ever-changing stream of information that will meet users’ deepest interests. If you’ve ever wondered how to make 100 unique pieces from one source, Google seems to have found the answer in AI.

    According to job postings, the Discover Feed Recommendation team will “recommend AI-generated content (AIGC) to meet user interests.” This is not just a recommendation, but an entire system capable of circumventing traditional algorithms and offering something completely new, unique to each user.

    How Google Plans to Transform Discover with AI

    Job postings reveal Google’s ambitious plans to transform Discover into a “proactive, hyper-personalized concierge service.” This means that the platform will not just show you content, but also anticipate your needs, offering information that will help you achieve your goals.

    Roles and Responsibilities of New Specialists

    • Staff ML Engineer: This role involves quality control, topic discovery, and content understanding for the Discover team’s AI-generated content. Tasks include building agent flows that generate content for “proactive surfaces” like Discover and Notifications. Special attention is paid to fact-checking, relevance, coherence, and tone, as well as feedback mechanisms for finding and delivering engaging stories worldwide.
    • Senior Staff ML Software Engineer: Similar work, but at a higher level, with an emphasis on the quality of AI-generated content used across all major Google platforms.
    • Principal UX (Director+): This leadership design position aims to transform Discover into a “concierge experience” that helps users progress towards their goals. The salary for this position ranges from $275,000 to $382,000 USD plus bonuses and stock. The specialist will work with YouTube, Shopping, Chrome, and Android teams, scaling AI formats in the feed while keeping the human voice and sources at the forefront.

    “Our goal is to help people dive deeper into their interests and move from inspiration to action,” one job posting states.

    This is not just content repurposing; it’s its complete repackaging and adaptation to individual needs, almost like creating “video DNA” for each user.

    Google is already actively integrating AI into Discover. In October 2023 (presumed typo correction in the original), AI previews for trending topics were launched in the US, South Korea, and India, each linking to content on the internet. This is an excellent example of how video uniqueness and articles can help bypass anti-plagiarism and attract new audiences.

    Features already available or being tested:

    • Discover Customization: Since August, users can customize their feed, indicating what they want to see more or less of.
    • “Dive Deeper” Button: In September, Robbie Stein, VP of Product at Google Search, announced testing a button that opens a brief overview of a topic with links to related stories, starting with videos. This is a kind of “video matryoshka,” where many small pieces of content, adapted for TikTok, Shorts, and Reels, can be obtained from one large piece of content.

    The Discover Experience team, responsible for the user-facing part of the feed, including AI integration, serves over 500 million active users daily, making Discover one of the largest products in the world.

    Google hires engineers to create AI content in Discover — illustration 2

    Search Console Report and Control over AI Content

    Search Console already provides reports on when links to your site appear in Discover’s generative AI features. This allows webmasters to track the effectiveness of their pages in Google’s new recommendation “matrix.”

    • The report shows impressions of links to your site in Discover’s generative AI features, grouped by page, country, and date.
    • The “Pages” view lists the canonical URLs that provided the information shown in these features.

    It’s important to note that the inclusion of your site in Discover’s generative AI features is regulated through Search generative AI control, which also covers AI Overviews and AI Mode. Excluding a site from these features prevents its links and content from appearing in generative AI Search.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is content repurposing in simple terms?

    Content repurposing is the process of transforming existing content into new formats or for new audiences. For example, turning a webinar into 50 short clips for social media or adapting an article into an infographic. This allows you to scale content and get more return on invested resources.

    Should I order uniqueness or create new content?

    It depends on your goals and budget. Video uniqueization and other content can be significantly cheaper and faster than creating new content from scratch, especially if you already have high-quality source material. For bypassing ad bans or for generating variations for A/B tests, uniqueization is a powerful tool.

    How does AI help in bypassing anti-plagiarism?

    AI can analyze text or video, identify key elements, and rephrase them, change the structure, background, voice timbre, creating new, unique versions. This allows you to get a uniqueization package that passes originality checks while maintaining the main meaning and message.

    Conclusion

    Google is actively investing in the development of AI-generated content for Discover, striving to create the most personalized and proactive user experience. This opens up new opportunities for content creators in the field of repurposing and uniqueization. Monitor Search Console reports and experiment with adapting your content to make the most of these innovations. Start adapting your content for different social networks today to be at the forefront of this digital transformation!

  • Melius: From Ramp Engineers to $25 Million for AI Video Generation

    Melius: From Ramp Engineers to $25 Million for AI Video Generation

    In a world where speed and efficiency play a key role, Melius, a platform for creating advertising campaigns, images, and videos using artificial intelligence, is making a real breakthrough. The company announced that it has raised $25 million in investments, which underscores the enormous potential of AI video generation in the modern industry. This significant financial influx includes a $20 million Series A round led by CRV and an initial $5 million round from General Catalyst. Founded by former Ramp engineers, Melius demonstrates impressive growth, achieving over $1 million in annual recurring revenue just two months after emerging from stealth mode in July.

    Melius Raises $25 Million: Revolutionizing AI Ad Generation

    From Idea to Scaling: How Melius Reinvented Itself

    Melius co-founder Juwon Kim admits that the company’s journey was not smooth. Initially, over a year ago, the team, consisting of Juwon Kim, Yang Kim, and Arnav Ramu (all three former Ramp engineers), focused on creating a tool to optimize advertising spending.

    However, as Kim notes, after six months, it became clear that the initial idea “had no prospects.”

    “We completely destroyed the entire codebase; we burned it all down,” Kim told TechCrunch.

    This decisive step allowed Melius to reorient itself to a much larger task: developing tools for generating creative assets themselves and advertising campaigns. This marked the beginning of a new era for the company, creating an “agent lab for creative work.”

    Melius in the Competitive Landscape of AI Production

    The market for AI creative generation is rapidly evolving. Among Melius’s competitors are projects such as Higgsfield, which was valued at $5.4 billion in August and demonstrates annual revenue of over $700 million. There are also smaller players, such as Krea and Flora AI. Juwon Kim sees no problem with this, emphasizing the enormous potential of the market.

    • Higgsfield: Valuation of $5.4 billion, annual revenue of $700+ million.
    • Krea: A young startup in the field of AI generation.
    • Flora AI: Another player creating creatives with AI.

    “There are a lot of players out there, and it’s pretty exciting,” Kim noted. “It means there are customers to win, and there’s demand in this space.” This confirms our position that the cost of one AI creative today is significantly lower than traditional production, which opens up huge opportunities for mass video generation by neural networks.

    Melius: from Ramp engineers to $ million for AI video generation — illustration 2

    From YouTube Dream to AI Avatars: The Founder’s Personal Motivation

    Interestingly, behind the decision of the former Ramp engineers to engage in advertising generation is Juwon Kim’s personal story. He describes himself as a social media influencer and dreamed of creating short videos since childhood. “I tried my best to make vlogs,” Kim recalls. “My father was great at FinalCut Pro, and I wasn’t.”

    These early attempts were unsuccessful, but his passion for digital media remained. Now, with Melius, Kim is building the tool he always dreamed of: a platform where anyone, from an experienced creative director to a novice, can bring their ideas to life using video generation from text.

    This will allow content creation to be scaled in ways previously impossible, making subscription-based neuro-production accessible to everyone looking for AI efficiency versus real UGC.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Question Answer
    What is Melius and what services does it offer? Melius is an AI platform for generating advertising campaigns, images, and videos. It allows users to create creative assets using artificial intelligence, which significantly simplifies and speeds up the content production process.
    How much investment has Melius attracted? Melius has attracted a total of $25 million: $20 million in a Series A round and $5 million in an initial round.
    Who founded Melius? Melius was founded by former Ramp engineers: Juwon Kim, Yang Kim, and Arnav Ramu.
    What is Melius’s annual revenue? Melius achieved over $1 million in annual recurring revenue just two months after emerging from stealth mode in July.
    Does Melius have competitors in the AI ad generation market? Yes, Melius has competitors such as Higgsfield, Krea, and Flora AI. However, Melius founders are confident that the market is large enough for multiple players.

    Conclusion

    The story of Melius is a vivid example of how flexibility and foresight can lead to success in the rapidly changing world of technology. By abandoning its initial idea, the team created a platform that not only attracts significant investment but also promises to revolutionize AI video for advertising. We see how neural networks are transforming content creation, making AI conveyor 500 videos per day possible and offering new opportunities for scaling creative processes.

    If you want to know where to order AI UGC for a crypto project or how to generate 100 videos using neural networks, Melius demonstrates that the future is already here. Join this neuro-revolution and contact us to find out how AI can scale your content production!

  • Vibecoding: Real Project Incomes and Myths About Millions

    Vibecoding: Real Project Incomes and Myths About Millions

    Talks of millions from vibecoding are everywhere: a million in 17 days, a million by October, a million from one prompt. I decided to investigate: how many projects have truly crossed the threshold of $100,000 in monthly revenue or $1,000,000 in total income (including exit value). The picture turned out to be much more modest than expected. If we exclude projects whose product itself is an AI solution, very few startups based specifically on vibecoding remain.

    In this analysis, I do not conflate ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue) and actual revenue. ARR is a projection of the current month multiplied by twelve, not money earned. Where a source indicates ARR, I note it and recalculate the monthly revenue separately. The order of projects in the table below is determined not by revenue size, but by the reliability of financial data confirmation.

    Projects that have crossed the $100,000/month or $1 million total income threshold

    The list includes projects with public reports of revenue from $100,000 per month or cumulative income from $1,000,000.

    1. Medvi: $401 million in the first year

      Telemedicine specializing in GLP-1 weight loss drugs. Founder Matthew Gallagher launched the project in September 2024 with an investment of about $20,000. According to publications, the first year brought $401 million in revenue, about 250,000 clients, and $65 million in profit with a 16% margin. Staff: two people (Gallagher himself and his brother Elliot), the rest are contractors.

      • Vibecoding: Code, website, and agents were written using Claude, Grok, and ChatGPT. Visuals for advertising — Midjourney and Runway. Client calls — ElevenLabs.
      • Business essence: The main part of the business — doctors, pharmacy, prescription writing, and legal framework — is outsourced through CareValidate, OpenLoop Health, and LegalZoom. Gallagher focused on assembly and traffic.
    2. Base44: sold for $80 million

      An application builder from text description, created by Maor Shlomo. Launched in early 2025. In May, the company showed $189,000 in monthly profit. In June, Wix announced its acquisition for $80 million in cash. At the time of the deal, the project had 250,000 users. Shlomo was the sole owner, but at the time of sale, eight people worked for the company, who received $25 million from the deal amount as retention.

      • Vibecoding: Shlomo deliberately built the codebase so that most of it was generated by models, and used prompt routing between different models. This is one of the purest examples where the product itself is vibecoding and built using the same method.
      • Confirmation: Financial performance is confirmed by the deal document, not a tweet.
    3. Peec AI: $4M ARR (up to $833,000/month)

      A Berlin-based company that tracks how a brand is represented in AI search (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini). Founder Marius Meiners. The first prototype was built on v0 from Vercel in about a day and a half. The product was then developed in a traditional way by a team. In November 2025, the company announced a Series A of $21 million, with a total of $29 million raised. At that time, Peec AI had 1300+ connected companies and ARR of about $4 million (approximately $333,000 per month). Later, ARR grew to $10 million (about $833,000 per month).

      • Vibecoding: Used to quickly create a prototype and test demand, but the main product was built traditionally.
    4. Wave AI: $7M ARR

      An application for recording, transcribing, and retelling audio, focused on casual conversations, not meetings. Author Josh Moorer, former Uber GM for New York, not a programmer. He built the first working prototype in Swift in a day using ChatGPT. The project reached $7 million ARR with $3 million in annual profit and about 4000 paid subscribers.

      • Vibecoding: Prototype created with AI.
      • Feature: High costs for accessing the best models to ensure transcription quality, which is the key product.

    Projects that did not reach the threshold, but are often mentioned

    These projects often appear in selections, but their financial performance does not meet the specified threshold.

    1. Cal AI: $2M monthly revenue, but the label is questionable

      An application for counting calories from a photo of food. Authors Zach Yadegari and Henry Langmack. Launched in May 2024. By July 2025 – 8.3 million downloads and, according to CNBC Make It, about $1.4 million in gross monthly profit, and $2 million in monthly revenue is also mentioned. It passes in terms of money, but not in terms of the vibecoding label. TechCrunch revealed that Yadegari wrote the code himself, starting programming at the age of ten. Anthropic and OpenAI models are only used for image recognition within the product.

    2. fly.pieter.com: $1M ARR, but peak $87,000/month

      A browser-based flight simulator by Pieter Levels. Basic prototype in 30 minutes. $1M ARR was announced in February 2025, 17 days after release. Peak monthly revenue was around $87,000. Monetization: paid aircraft models and items for $29.99. Levels’ method: “one prompt – one layer.” $1M ARR is an annual projection, not a million earned. The project did not reach the $100,000 monthly revenue threshold.

    3. Stanley: $1M ARR, but not revenue

      An AI content tool created by Vitaly Dodonov and Jon Hu in 14 days. The LinkedIn version was released in June 2025 and showed $200,000 ARR after six weeks. The team passed the $1M ARR mark by October 2025. “14-day app” refers to the first working cut, not the full product. The main value was added after launch. Again, this is ARR, not actual revenue.

    4. Lumoo: €700,000 ARR, about €58,000/month

      A platform for fashion and retail brands by Henrik Skagerlind Fast and Peter Törngren. Offers photorealistic visualizations and virtual try-on. According to the Lovable case, in nine months the product reached €700,000 ARR, connecting more than fifteen brands. The goal is €1M ARR by November 2025. Monthly revenue is about €58,000, which is below the threshold. The project’s success is due to the founders’ industry connections, not a generated interface.

    5. Plinq: $456,000 ARR, about $38,000/month

      A background and safety check app by Sabine Matos. Built entirely on Lovable. 6,000 ARR was reported, R3 million raised, and over 10,000 users. 6,000 ARR is about $500 a month, and that’s in the best interpretation. The case is interesting because the app gathered an audience before it made money. Investments came after users appeared, not because the first version was generated by a tool.

      Вайбкодинг: реальные доходы проектов и мифы о миллионах — illustration 2

    General Conclusions and Key Success Factors

    Analysis shows that project success is not limited to cheap, AI-generated code. There are several common traits among successful startups.

    Team Size at Launch

    Four out of five successful cases started with one or two people. This is not so much a credit to vibecoding as it is an indicator that a product can be built faster than a team can be formed.

    Infrastructure on Others’ Shoulders

    Successful projects actively used third-party services and APIs:

    • Medvi outsourced doctors, pharmacies, and lawyers.
    • Wave AI used third-party APIs for transcription.
    • Cal AI — for recognition and product database.
    • Lumoo integrated into existing brand workflows.

    Only what was not on the market had to be built from scratch.

    Money doesn’t come from cheap code

    No product won solely due to cheap or generated code. Money came from other factors:

    • Cal AI — through influencers.
    • Stanley — through distribution via LinkedIn.
    • Medvi — through contractors with licenses.
    • Wave AI — through expensive inference (model computations).
    • Plinq — through an audience that appeared before revenue.

    Code generation shortens the path to launch but is not the main source of income.

    Multimodel Verification Method

    Almost all teams in the selection use the trick: run one task through several models and compare the results. This is how Peec AI checked demand, Base44 routed prompts, and Levels assembled game layers, changing the model for each task. This allows for quick hypothesis testing and finding optimal solutions. You can test this approach in an evening: take your current prompt and run it through three different models to see the discrepancies and choose the best option.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What CPM should be considered profitable for hypothesis testing?

    For hypothesis testing, not only CPM is important, but also the speed of data acquisition. If AI tools allow for quick creative generation and campaign launches, then even with a relatively high CPM, hypothesis testing is cheap due to reduced time and labor costs. A profitable CPM is one that provides sufficient data volume for decision-making with minimal launch costs. For example, if the price per one finished clip, generated by AI, allows launching 100 variants for the same budget as 10 variants from a human, it is profitable.

    What’s cheaper: banner advertising or bloggers?

    A direct price comparison is difficult, as the result is different. Banner advertising (how much does 1 million impressions via banner cost) can be cheaper in terms of CPM, for example, CPM cheaper than 50 rubles per 1000 impressions. But bloggers provide native integration and audience trust. For a budget alternative to blogger seeding, you can consider a mass-posting package price which will be lower, but the reach may be less targeted. Cheaper than influencers can only be your own traffic or very targeted advertising.

    Is it worth investing in AI for content creation?

    If the goal is to reduce content production costs and increase speed, then is AI worth it — definitely yes. For example, the cost of generating 100 AI videos will be many times lower than creating them manually. The cost of uniqueizing one video with AI also significantly reduces costs. However, it is important to remember that price vs result is a key factor. AI speeds up the process, but a quality result still requires human control and refinement.

    How to estimate the cost of AI video production?

    The price per minute of AI video with an avatar can vary. It is important to consider not only generation, but also how much it costs to cut 1 hour of stream into short clips using AI. This allows for a lot of content from one source. The cost of publishing 500 videos, if they are generated or cut by AI, will be significantly lower than manual work. What is cheaper: banner or target — this is a question of effectiveness, not just price, and AI can increase the effectiveness of any channel through personalization and scale.

    Conclusion

    Analysis shows that “millions on vibecoding” is more of a myth than a reality, if we consider the net income from generated code. The success of projects lies in the ability to quickly assemble an MVP, use third-party infrastructure, and scale the business through effective distribution and customer work, and not just through cheap code. The unit economics of these projects are based on a comprehensive approach. Before believing in another success story, always demand statistics screenshots and ask the main question: how much money will each ruble spent bring. For those who are ready to experiment, we recommend trying different models on the same task. Use promo code CTRLAI for a 20% discount on any plan at SYNTX.AI.

  • AI Industry: Slowdown or Strategic Move?

    AI Industry: Slowdown or Strategic Move?

    In the world of artificial intelligence, a serious discussion is brewing: should we slow down the pace of development or continue to move forward without looking back? Against the backdrop of Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s plans to “pace the frontier” and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang’s statements about the unnecessary nature of regulation, the question arises: how serious are the intentions of industry leaders like Amodei and OpenAI’s Sam Altman regarding a slowdown?

    Slowing Down AI Progress: Myth or Reality?

    On the latest TechCrunch Equity podcast, Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and Anthony Ha discussed these conflicting opinions. Anthony Ha was surprised by how many industry leaders supported Amodei’s plan.

    However, Sean O’Kane noted that the plan looks vague and lacks specifics, which raises doubts about its feasibility.

    Lack of Regulation and Consumer Choice

    “The federal government right now is certainly not eager to broadly apply regulation, let alone in specific cases,” Sean O’Kane stated, emphasizing that existing laws are not always effective in a rapidly changing technological environment.

    He also noted that in the market for AI solutions, there is virtually no consumer choice that could serve as leverage over companies.

    “It doesn’t feel like consumer choice is heavily influencing this market in the sense that if one of these companies does something really bad, they’re going to see the consequences in terms of cancellations or anything,” O’Kane added.

    This means that even serious missteps by major players may not lead to significant financial losses due to the loyalty of corporate clients and huge investments.

    Jensen Huang and Nvidia’s Position

    Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang publicly spoke out against a slowdown, supporting Donald Trump’s view that fears about AI are a “hoax” and regulation is unnecessary.

    His position raises questions, given that Nvidia is one of the main beneficiaries of the rapid development of AI technologies, supplying the necessary equipment for rendering and training neural networks.

    Why is Nvidia Against a Slowdown?

    • Economic interests: The rapid growth of AI directly correlates with the increased demand for Nvidia’s graphics processors. A slowdown could negatively impact their revenues.
    • Role of the “adult in the room”: Sean O’Kane believes that Huang positions himself as the “adult in the room,” aiming to be a useful liaison between the industry and the administration. This allows him to influence decisions and shape the agenda.
  • Lack of direct competition: Nvidia does not develop end-user AI models, but provides infrastructure, so the direct risks from “unsafe” AI are lower for them.

Specifics of “moderate development” proposals

Kirsten Coroset mentioned proposals for “moderate development,” which include:

  1. Attracting independent third-party evaluators to monitor AI safety within companies such as Anthropic and OpenAI.
  2. Coordination between major AI companies in democratic countries to develop common safety standards and restrictions.
  3. International coordination of efforts to regulate AI.

However, as Coroset noted, these proposals suffer from a lack of specifics. It is unclear who will act as independent evaluators, what standards will be applied, and how international cooperation will be carried out.

AI Industry: Slowdown or Strategic Move? — illustration 2

This creates the impression that statements about a “slowdown” may be more declarative than practical.

AI pipeline: from text to video in seconds

While discussions about regulation continue, the AI video generation industry is demonstrating unprecedented growth rates. Companies like Synthesia and other market players offer solutions for mass video generation by neural networks, opening new horizons for business.

We see how neural networks allow the creation of AI commercials, animated AI characters, and even AI avatars with subtitles and AI voiceovers.

Advantages of AI production:

  • Speed: An AI pipeline can produce hundreds of videos per day, which was impossible to scale – now possible.
  • Cost savings: The cost of 1 minute of AI video is significantly lower than traditional production. This makes neuro-production by subscription accessible even for small businesses.
  • Personalization: The ability to generate video from text and use mass generation API allows for the creation of unique content for each client.
  • Efficiency: The efficiency of AI versus real UGC (User-Generated Content) can in some cases be higher, especially when dealing with large volumes of content.

These technologies are actively used in e-commerce, for AI UGC advertising, and even in crypto projects, where fast and effective communication with the audience is required.

The ability of neural networks to write scripts and edit videos significantly reduces the time and cost of content creation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is AI content production?

AI content production is the process of creating video, audio, and text content using artificial intelligence technologies. This includes generating video from text, creating animated AI characters, AI voiceovers, and even neural networks writing scripts and editing.

How much does one AI creative cost?

The cost of an AI creative can vary depending on complexity, duration, and features used. However, in general, the cost of 1 minute of AI video is significantly lower than traditional production methods, making it accessible to a wide range of companies, including startups and projects in the cryptocurrency sector.

Where to order AI video for crypto?

For AI UGC for a crypto project, you can turn to specialized platforms and studios that offer services for mass video generation by neural networks. Many of them provide AI production by subscription and use mass generation API to create content tailored to the specific needs of the crypto industry.

Conclusion

The discussion about slowing down the development of the AI industry, while important for ensuring safety, faces pragmatic interests and a lack of clear implementation mechanisms. At the same time, AI video generation continues to develop rapidly, offering businesses unprecedented opportunities for content creation.

Instead of slowing down, we are likely to see increased competition and the emergence of new, even more effective solutions for AI production. Want to know how AI video for advertising can scale your business? Contact us to discuss the possibilities of an AI video factory for e-commerce and generating 100 videos for your marketing campaigns.

  • AI Search: How to Create Content That Is Actually Indexed and Useful

    AI Search: How to Create Content That Is Actually Indexed and Useful

    In the era of mass AI video generation and other types of content, many companies face a problem: their new pages, created specifically to improve visibility in AI search, are not being indexed and are not bringing the expected results. Why does this happen, and how can one build an effective workflow for AI video for advertising and other formats? The answer lies in understanding not just content gaps, but solution gaps.

    The Problem of “Content Parity” in AI Search

    One client found that their new pages, created for AI search, were not being indexed by Google. The team followed all recommendations: analyzed AI responses, studied competitors, identified gaps, and created more comprehensive content. However, in Google Search Console, these pages had the status “Crawled – currently not indexed.”

    “Indexing takes time,” said the SEO consultant, but a month had already passed.

    The problem lay in what is called “content parity.” The content was high-quality and well-organized, but it merely repeated existing information without adding anything new. This did not lead to information gain, which AI values so much.

    Differences Between Information Gain and Competitive Gaps

    • Competitive gaps: This is what you lack but your competitors have. Filling these gaps is important, but not always sufficient for information gain.
    • Information gain: This is new, unique information that helps the user or AI make a decision.

    Solution Gaps: The Key to Effective Content

    Instead of simply filling competitive gaps, it is necessary to focus on solution gaps. This is information that the user or LLM needs to make a decision, but which neither you nor your competitors have.

    Example: “Best Family Resort in Cancun”

    The query “What is the best all-inclusive family resort on the beach in Cancun?” is not just a set of keywords. It is a request for a decision. The AI system must evaluate criteria: “all-inclusive,” “family,” “on the beach.”

    “All-inclusive”: Not as Simple as It Seems

    The definition of “all-inclusive” is often vague. Marketing is great at selling a promise but poor at defining boundaries. For example, one resort states in its FAQ that the package includes accommodation, meals, drinks, sports, entertainment, and children’s programs, but excursions and spa treatments may be at an additional cost.

    Another resort dedicates an entire page to “all-inclusive” services, but a precise definition of what exactly is included is hard to find.

    The problem is not the lack of content, but that it doesn’t fully resolve the criteria. The user or AI has to piece together the definition to understand where “all-inclusive” ends and “additional costs” begin.

    “Family-friendly”: what lies behind the beautiful words

    A similar situation applies to “family-friendly.” A resort may have an excellent section for children and families, but the description of the program for teenagers aged 14-17 might be too general. A parent wants to know specifics: is it supervised childcare or optional activities? What are the operating hours? What activities are offered? Do teenagers leave the premises? What level of supervision is provided? These questions remain unanswered.

    Content analysis tools might show that the resort has “strong thematic coverage” for teen programs. But a parent doesn’t evaluate content architecture; they make a decision that will meet their family’s needs.

    A new approach to content creation: from criteria to knowledge

    To create content that is truly indexed and useful, we need to change our approach. Instead of simply generating content, we must:

    AI search: How to create content that is truly indexed and useful — illustration 2
    1. Define the client’s solution: What is the client or LLM trying to solve?
    2. Identify solution criteria: What criteria are important for making this decision?
    3. Find existing evidence: Where is the information that supports these criteria?
    4. Discover gaps in evidence: What information is missing?
    5. Qualify the gaps: Is it a knowledge gap, information fragmentation, or intentional omission?
    6. Acquire knowledge: If information is missing, how can it be obtained?
    7. Validate: Check the accuracy and completeness of the information.
    8. Create content: Using AI, transform knowledge into content.

    Where to get new knowledge?

    AI can analyze thousands of pages, but it cannot “produce” an organizational fact. If the policy for supervising a teen program is not documented, the model will not know it. If no one has measured the actual distance from the room to the beach, AI will not create that knowledge.

    Answers can be found in:

    • Support tickets
    • Call center transcripts
    • Internal site search queries
    • CRM records
    • Product documentation
    • Surveys
    • Training materials
    • The minds of expert employees

    Sometimes even Reddit, reviews, forums, and other communities where people discuss details that companies miss are useful. For example, a resort describes itself as “family-friendly,” and a frustrated parent explains what happened when they tried to enroll a three-year-old in the kids’ club.

    AI and the Future of Content

    AI has significantly reduced the cost of converting knowledge into content. Now, subscription-based neuro-production or an AI pipeline generating 500 videos per day have become a reality. However, this does not negate the need for knowledge acquisition. Text-to-video generation or mass generation APIs do not create facts; they merely process existing data.

    The advantage shifts up the chain: to a better understanding of customer decisions, identifying criteria that others have missed, uncovering operational knowledge hidden within the organization, connecting it to your products and experience, and validating the answer before publication. This is not just about creating AI commercials or AI UGC for a crypto project; it’s about creating value.

    Sometimes this means analyzing queries, sometimes listening to support calls, sometimes discovering that Reddit users are answering a question the company never addressed. And sometimes it means something that seems old-fashioned: talking to an expert and gaining new knowledge.

    AI can help us identify gaps, organize evidence, and transform acquired knowledge into useful content. But for true informational gain, there must always be something new to acquire.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is “content parity” and why is it harmful for SEO?

    Content parity is the creation of content that almost completely duplicates information already available from competitors or other sources. It is harmful for SEO because search engines, especially AI search, look for unique, valuable, and new information (informational gain) that helps the user make a decision, rather than simply copying what has already been said. Such content is often not indexed or ranks poorly.

    How can AI help in creating content that brings informational gain?

    AI can significantly speed up many stages of content creation: from competitor analysis and identifying existing gaps to organizing evidence and transforming knowledge into content. However, AI cannot independently create new, unique knowledge. It is a powerful tool for processing and structuring information, but human input in the form of research, expert knowledge, and understanding user needs remains critically important for achieving informational gain.

    In what way do competitive gaps and solution gaps differ?

    Competitive gaps are areas of content where your competitors have information, but you don’t. Filling these gaps helps you catch up with competitors. Solution gaps are information that a user (or AI) needs to make an important decision, but which neither you nor your competitors have, or it is fragmented and incomplete. Focusing on solution gaps allows you to create truly valuable and unique content.

    Master new approaches to content creation so that your AI avatar with subtitles or AI face-swap clips not only generate videos but also provide real value. Discover how neural networks write scripts and edit, while you focus on the main thing – knowledge. Find out how much one AI creative costs or the cost of 1 minute of AI video, and how to maximize ROI by creating content that truly solves customer problems.

  • How much does AI advertising cost: a 25-second video for ₽2,126

    How much does AI advertising cost: a 25-second video for ₽2,126

    Generative AI promises a revolution, but the real cost of content production often remains hidden. We calculated how much it costs to create a 25-second commercial using neural networks, including script, images, video, voiceover, and music. Spoiler: the 25-second video cost 2,126 ₽, or 85 ₽ per second. The lion’s share of the budget, almost 90%, was “eaten up” by video generation.

    How much does AI advertising cost: a 25-second video for 2,126 ₽

    In a world where technology is developing at an incredible pace, artificial intelligence is becoming an integral part of many industries, including content creation. But what is the real price of this innovation? We conducted an experiment to find out how much it costs to create a 25-second commercial entirely with neural networks. The results may surprise you, because the cost of unique content for one video and profitable CPM for advertising materials are becoming key factors.

    The experiment was conducted through BotHub using the following models:

    • GPT-6 Astra for script and prompt refinement.
    • Nano Banana 2 for generating source images.
    • Kling v3 for converting images to video.
    • ElevenLabs Flash v3 for voiceover.
    • Suno v5.5 for musical accompaniment.

    We advertised a herbarium, without commercial implications. Important: only the marginal cost was taken into account — the cost of successful generations included in the final video. Actual costs may vary depending on prompting skills and perfectionism level, increasing the number of regenerations and, accordingly, the budget.

    Methodology for calculating the cost of AI production

    For an objective assessment, it is important to distinguish between two types of costs:

    1. Cost of result generation: direct computational costs for content creation.
    2. Cost of infrastructure access: costs for subscriptions or minimum credit packages for using services.

    In the case of a single video, the second amount can significantly exceed the first. Of course, open-source models can be deployed locally, but this requires a powerful PC, which is not always available.

    «Don’t replace professionals with browser tabs. AI content has nuances: rights, licenses, character stability, result control, and brand requirements. AI slop is easy to get, and you’ll get flamed for it».

    Step 1: AI-powered ad script

    We started by creating a concept. GPT-6 Astra acted as a creative producer and scriptwriter. The prompt was formulated so that the model immediately took into account the limitations of AI generation and formed prompts for each element.

    Prompt to GPT-6 Astra:

    «Role: You are an experienced creative producer and scriptwriter specializing in creating advertisements using neural networks. Task: Develop a detailed script for a 25-second commercial for a Herbarium (an album with a collection of dried plants/herbs). Important condition: All content (video, photo, audio) will be AI-generated. Therefore, your task is not just to provide a script with a description of the picture, but a script supplemented with prompts for each element. Atmosphere: warm, autumn, cozy».

    The script development and adjustments took ₽102.09.

    Step 2: Generating images for the ad

    Nano Banana 2 was used to create eight base images that set the composition, atmosphere, and style. The total cost of this stage was ₽128.29, which is an average of ₽16 per image.

    The images served as an intermediate state: they fixed the spatial structure of the frame, which simplifies the task for the video model. This allows for consistency between scenes, which is critical for a commercial.

    Image-to-video: precise control over the result

    Unlike text-to-video, where the model simultaneously interprets the description, chooses the composition, and adds movement, image-to-video fixes most variables. This gives greater control over the result and ensures stylistic unity across all frames, which reduces the cost of uniqueizing one video and provides a favorable CPM for advertising materials.

    Step 3: Video generation: the most expensive part of AI advertising

    Converting static images into video scenes is the most resource-intensive stage. Seven video scenes were generated using Kling v3 Video, preserving the original composition and adding natural dynamics.

    The cost of one video scene was about ₽268, and the total cost of video generation was ₽1,878.17. This is 88% of the total budget. The high cost is due to the need to ensure temporal consistency: objects, camera, lighting, and scene geometry must be stable throughout the video.

    How much does AI advertising cost: a 25-second video for ₽2,126 — illustration 2

    Step 4: Ad voiceover with ElevenLabs: cheap and tasteful

    ElevenLabs Flash v3 was used for the voiceover. This stage turned out to be one of the cheapest — only 6.04 ₽. TTS technologies significantly simplify the process compared to traditional voice actor recording, providing fast generation and low costs. This is an excellent option for cheap hypothesis testing and prototypes.

    Step 5: Music for advertising in Suno: budget and limitations

    The musical accompaniment was created using Suno v5.5. The model allows describing the mood and genre, rather than specific notes, which is convenient for advertising tasks. The cost of music generation was 11.82 ₽.

    Although AI music saves budget, full control over the result is not guaranteed. However, for small projects, it is an effective alternative to stock tracks or ordering original music.

    Total cost and comparison with direct subscriptions

    The total cost of a 25-second advertising video created with AI was 2,126.41 ₽.

    Tool Cost
    Script and prompts (GPT-6 Astra) 102.09 ₽
    Base images (Nano Banana 2) 128.29 ₽
    Video generation (Kling v3 Video) 1,878.17 ₽
    Voiceover (ElevenLabs Flash v3) 6.04 ₽
    Music (Suno v5.5) 11.82 ₽
    TOTAL 2,126.41 ₽

    If access to each service were paid for separately, minimum monthly subscriptions would be around 3,591 ₽ (at an exchange rate of $1 = 86.4 ₽):

    • ChatGPT (Plus): $20 (~1,729 ₽)
    • Nano Banana 2: ~$0.54 (~47 ₽)
    • Kling v3 Video: $6.99 (~604 ₽)
    • ElevenLabs Flash: $6 (~519 ₽)
    • Suno v5.5: $8 (~692 ₽)

    These 3,591 ₽ are more of a starting capital than the cost of a single video, as tariffs usually include many more credits than required for one project. This highlights the benefit of using aggregators like BotHub for one-off tasks or cheap hypothesis testing.

    Conclusions and prospects for AI production

    AI production is not yet a seamless process. Each model has its own features and data formats. Cohesion between stages is ensured by an external workflow: prompts, references, manual editing. This distinguishes the demonstration of individual model capabilities from a full-fledged production system, where all elements must work in unison. The price per finished clip with AI can be significantly lower than traditional production, but requires competent pipeline management.

    Overall, AI tools significantly lower the barrier to entry for video content creation, offering a budget-friendly alternative to seeding and traditional production studios. However, obtaining a high-quality result requires skills and an understanding of each model’s limitations. This makes CPM profitable for testing various advertising creatives.

    Frequently asked questions

    What CPM should be considered profitable for AI advertising?

    A profitable CPM depends on the niche and campaign goals. If the cost of producing a video is low, as in our case, then even with an average CPM, the overall return on investment (ROI) can be high. The main advantage is the ability to quickly and cheaply test hypotheses.

    What is cheaper: a banner, a blogger, or an AI video?

    A direct comparison is incorrect, as these are different formats with different goals. However, AI video offers cheap hypothesis testing and can be significantly cheaper than producing a video with a blogger or even some types of banners, especially if complex animations are required. The cost of creating one AI video at 2,126 ₽ makes it competitive for mass content production.

    Is it worth investing in AI for content production?

    Yes, it is. AI significantly reduces the time and cost of production, allowing for quick creation and testing of advertising materials. This is especially relevant for small and medium-sized businesses, as well as for arbitragers who value the cash and unit economics of each creative. However, it is necessary to consider that the price vs. result strongly depends on the skills of working with prompts and post-processing.

    How much does it cost to cut 1 hour of stream using AI?

    The cost of cutting an hour of stream using AI will depend on the services used and their rates for video processing. If it’s about creating short clips, it can be significantly cheaper than manual work and comparable to the price of generating one video, as the main costs will be for transcription and content analysis, not for generating video from scratch.

    What is the price per minute of AI video with an avatar?

    The price per minute of AI video with an avatar varies depending on the platform and the complexity of the avatar (2D, 3D, customization). In our experiment, 25 seconds of video cost 1,878 ₽, which is equivalent to approximately 4,500 ₽ per minute if only the video generation cost is extrapolated. However, avatar platforms have their own rates, which can be both higher and lower, depending on the features and quality provided.

    AI advertising opens up new horizons for content creation, making it more accessible and faster. If you want to delve deeper into the world of AI and learn how it can transform your business, visit our blog. Discover new opportunities and start creating unique content today!

  • AI Content Factory: How to Scale Content Production Without Losing Quality

    AI Content Factory: How to Scale Content Production Without Losing Quality

    Creating an effective AI-powered content factory is not just about automation, but about building an entire system where neural networks handle routine operations, freeing up time for strategic planning. We, as producers, know: a tired streamer cannot generate ideas. How do you package raw material into highlights without losing quality and without turning the process into chaos? This article will help you build an assembly line where AI will not be a replacement, but a powerful assistant.

    What is a content factory and why is it needed?

    A content factory is a systematized process of content production, based on the principle of “One idea – many formats”. AI here does not completely replace humans, but automates repetitive actions. Our goal is not just to increase volume, but to create mass cutting of 100+ clips and other formats, while maintaining quality and relevance.

    The role of AI in the content conveyor

    AI can be implemented at almost every stage of content production, from idea to publication. However, its role should always be auxiliary. For example, a neural network can suggest 100 blog topics, but the choice of the most relevant and valuable ones remains with a human.

    This is especially true for expert content, where factual accuracy is critically important.

    “A neural network can easily generate a hundred blog topics for a dental clinic, an English school, or an online store. The harder part is understanding which of these are actually worth pursuing.”

    Defining goals and initial data

    Before building a “conveyor,” it is necessary to clearly define what problem it should solve. The phrase “We need more content” is too vague. We need to understand what exactly is missing: time, people, or money.

    Choosing a content factory strategy

    • A) Accelerating publication for multiple platforms: If the task is to quickly manage Telegram, VKontakte, and other social networks with a small team, the factory should reduce the time from idea generation to a complete set of publications.
    • B) Increasing organic traffic: In this case, the content factory is built around semantics. AI helps analyze search queries, identify gaps, and generate ideas for new articles optimized for SEO.
    • C) Reducing production costs: If the team spends a lot of time gathering factual material, the factory will help repackage one expensive source into several formats, saving budget.
  • Searching for “Raw Material” for a Content Factory

    Quality raw material is the key to successful production. For each strategy, it is different:

    Developing a Route: From Raw Material to Finished Content

    After defining the goal and raw material, it is necessary to think through the content movement route. This will help to understand how long each stage takes and where automation can be implemented.

    Route Examples

    1. For multi-platform publication: 🛠️ Facts → Format Selection → Tasks → Drafts → Editing → Visuals → Publication.
    2. For SEO traffic: 🛠️ Semantics → Analysis of existing materials → Cluster Selection → Sources and Facts → Article → Publication → Indexing → Next Material.
    3. For cost reduction: 🛠️ Expensive source material → Processing → Maximum repackaging (e.g., cutting a podcast into video clips, cropping 9:16 from horizontal footage).

    Automating Repetitive Operations

    AI is most effective where there are repetitive actions that do not require a new solution each time. These can be:

    Establishing Rules for AI

    For AI to work effectively, it needs clear rules and boundaries. Without them, it can generate meaningless or irrelevant content.

    Content Factory with AI: How to Scale Content Production Without Losing Quality — illustration 2

    Examples of Rules

  • To save budget: Determine what material is considered standalone, when a derivative format adds value, and what cannot be cut without losing meaning.
  • Implementing AI Tools

    Only after defining goals, raw materials, routes, and rules can specific AI tools be selected. It is important to understand what limitation we are removing and what area we are automating.

    Recommended Tools

    Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Content Factory

    The content factory’s performance should be checked at three levels:

    1. Production speed: How much time passes from factual material to publication? Where do delays occur?
    2. Control cost: How much time is spent checking and correcting AI drafts?
    3. Content results: Read-throughs, saves, clicks, leads, organic traffic, video views. It’s important that 50 additional posts don’t go “into the drawer.”

    “Good automation should reduce the cost per useful unit, not just increase the number of files in a folder.”

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How long does it take to cut a two-hour stream?

    Using specialized AI tools, such as Creoscan, cutting a two-hour stream into main highlights can take from 15 to 30 minutes, including automatic subtitle addition and adaptation to different formats, for example, cutting for TikTok from Twitch.

    What moments are usually cut from streams?

    From streams, highlights, funny moments, important announcements, key answers to audience questions, gaming achievements, and the host’s emotional reactions are usually cut. Anything that can attract attention and go viral.

    Are subtitles needed for cuts?

    Yes, subtitles for cuts are extremely important. They improve content accessibility, allow viewing videos without sound, and increase audience engagement, especially on social media, where many users watch videos without sound.

    Can I order 20 clips from a stream?

    Of course! Many studios and freelancers offer services for cutting without loss of quality. With AI tools, this can be done quickly and efficiently, resulting in 20 clips from a stream, ready for publication.

    Who is the person who cuts streams?

    A person who cuts streams is a video editor or content manager specializing in creating short, engaging videos from long live streams. They select the most interesting moments, add graphics, music, and subtitles to transform raw footage into ready-made highlights for various platforms.

    Conclusion

    Building an AI content factory is not an instant solution, but a sequential process. Start small: choose one repeatable content stream, work it out manually, and then automate the sections that do not require a new solution. This will allow you to effectively scale production, create 20 clips from a stream or dozens of posts, and ultimately, monetize a stream through cuts. Ready to start your conveyor? Try the tools we’ve discussed and turn your ideas into ready-made content today!

  • CPM profitable: Google and AI — people use both, not replace

    CPM profitable: Google and AI — people use both, not replace

    In the modern digital landscape, where technology is evolving at an incredible pace, the question of how artificial intelligence (AI) affects traditional traffic generation methods is becoming increasingly relevant. This is especially true for a metric like profitable CPM. Information categories are losing clicks, Google is losing queries, but retaining its audience. AI does not replace search, but complements it. How much cache will this bring? Let’s calculate.

    95% of ChatGPT users are still on Google: What does this mean?

    According to Similarweb, 95% of ChatGPT users continue to use Google. This figure remained at 95% from September 2025 to May 2026, even though traffic to generative AI platforms grew by 70% year-over-year. Similarweb interprets this as AI complementing search, not replacing it.

    However, a study by Bocconi University showed a decrease in traditional search queries by 9.4% among households that gained access to ChatGPT Search. The discrepancy in data is explained by Similarweb counting people (overlap), while Bocconi counts queries per household. The same user might use Google for maps or login, and redirect specific queries to ChatGPT.

    How does AI affect search behavior?

    • Reduced queries: Households with access to ChatGPT Search reduced the number of traditional search queries by an average of 3.14 per week, which is 9.4% less than the pre-expansion level (33.51 queries). The reduction reached 17.0% after 20 weeks.
    • Drop in referrals: The largest drop in referrals was observed in information categories: academic sites (-32.8%), reference sites (-26.5%), developer sites (-15.1%), news sites (-13.4%).
    • Increased ChatGPT reach: Google’s household reach remained stable (around 49%), while ChatGPT grew from 4.6% to 7.9%.

    “When people use our AI-powered features in Search, they use Search more often,” — Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google.

    However, Google does not provide baseline data or user-level data to independently verify these claims. We are seeing an increase in the use of AI features in Google, which may replace the traditional results page.

    Experiment with AI Mode: What happens to clicks?

    A study by Stephanie T. Wang and her team (August 2024) involving 1100 Chrome users showed that when AI Mode was forced (94.7% of queries via AI), the number of clicks to external sites decreased by 18.8 percentage points.

    • Search sessions decreased by approximately 0.92 per day.
    • The average session duration increased by 0.43 minutes.
    • Clicks to news sites fell by 12.5 points, Reddit by 21.2 points, Wikipedia by 9.9 points.
  • The share of participants using Bing, DuckDuckGo, or Yahoo increased by 11.2 points.
  • Trust, satisfaction, and usefulness ratings decreased.
  • At the same time, 15.3% of AI Mode users experienced difficulties accessing specific websites. It is important to note that in March 2024, AI Mode did not display ads. Since May 20, Google has been testing new ad formats created with Gemini in AI Mode, which may change satisfaction and click metrics.

    What do current data not account for?

    None of the current datasets track individual users across different platforms (Google Search, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Gemini) at a task level over the long term.

    Google does not disclose user-level data to support its claims. It is unclear what types of queries transition to AI and which remain in traditional search. Bocconi’s data on the division into informational and transactional categories is only descriptive.

    CPM выгодный: Google и AI — люди используют оба, не заменяют — illustration 2

    Conclusion: CPM is profitable, but where does the cash go?

    We see that Google retains users but loses some queries and clicks. Optimization for voice search and AI functionality are becoming critically important. If you are paying for a profitable CPM in traditional search, but users are switching to AI, your unit economics may suffer.

    Cheap hypothesis testing using AI tools for content creation (generating 100 AI videos, video uniqueization) can be more effective than traditional methods. Is AI worth investing in? Facts show that it changes user behavior. The question is how to convert this into cash.

    For an arbitrageur, this means: a CPM cheaper than 50 rubles for a banner may be useless if clicks go to AI. Strategies need to be adapted. Analyze your metrics, compare price vs result, to understand what CPM to consider profitable for your niche.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q: What is cheaper: banner or target?

    A: This depends on your target audience and campaign goals. Data shows that AI changes user behavior, reducing the clickability of traditional ads. It may be worth considering a budget alternative to seeding through AI content.

    Q: Is it worth investing in AI for content?

    A: Yes, data indicates a growing use of AI for information retrieval. The cost per finished clip created by AI, or the cost of making a video unique, can be significantly lower than manual production, while still providing effective reach.

    Q: What CPM should be considered profitable?

    A: A profitable CPM is determined not only by the cost per thousand impressions but also by conversion. If users use AI to get answers without visiting websites, then even a very low CPM will not yield the desired result. It is important to evaluate ROI.

    Q: How does AI affect SEO?

    A: AI can reduce the number of direct clicks to your site, especially for informational queries. Optimizing content for AI Overviews and creating FAQ sections for voice search becomes critically important.

    Call to action: Analyze your data, test new hypotheses, and adapt strategies to changing user behavior. AI is not the future; it is already the present. How much cash are you willing to lose by ignoring this?

  • Full-Cycle Video Production: How AI Tools Are Changing Content Creation by 2026

    Full-Cycle Video Production: How AI Tools Are Changing Content Creation by 2026

    In the field of full-cycle short video production and integrated promotion, artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming not just an assistant, but a key element capable of saving time and resources. However, to gain real benefits, it is important to choose the right tools. We will look at 11 proven solutions for creating texts, images, videos, and optimizing workflows, as well as their pricing policies.

    AI-powered content creation tools use algorithms to generate text, visual, audio, or video content based on given prompts. This allows teams to create materials faster and in larger volumes. The generative AI market is growing rapidly, with its volume projected to reach $394.66 billion by 2026, and AI-driven content will become one of the defining trends in social media.

    While AI primarily generated text in the past, by 2026, most tools have become multimodal and workflow-oriented. They can create drafts, develop designs, edit videos, and integrate into existing systems. These solutions can be divided into five categories:

    • Text writing and copywriting
    • Image generation
    • Video and audio
    • Presentations and design
    • Workflow management platforms

    Notable examples include ChatGPT, Midjourney, Jasper, Canva, and Hootsuite’s AI tools, which are now part of Perch in Hootsuite Social OS.

    Why does business need AI in content production?

    AI tools help marketers create, optimize, and scale content with less effort. They are indispensable for brainstorming, drafting, and performing routine tasks. Let’s look at four key benefits that should be integrated into your workflow:

    Time savings: from routine to strategy

    The most obvious advantage is time savings. 51% of content specialists already use AI to speed up production. AI takes on small, routine tasks, allowing your team to focus on strategic goals. For example:

    “I use AI to group tweets from my company’s blog articles,” shares Chelsea Hensley, Social Media Strategist at Visme. “For platforms like X/Twitter or Threads, this is extremely useful for repurposing already written (and approved by our team!) content into short tweets and threads.”

    Formatting is another easy win. “I can input my existing content or ideas and ask AI to format it into a bulleted list or even a neat table, which would take hours to do myself,” Hensley says. “Formatting is a great way for an SMM specialist to use AI.”

    Idea Generation: Breaking Through Creative Blocks

    Even the best brainstormers sometimes hit a wall. AI can kickstart the process to keep your team from slowing down. You still bring the strategy and creativity, but AI provides a starting point by generating prompts, angles, or post ideas that you can refine. Sometimes, the first batch of suggestions is all it takes to spark an idea you wouldn’t have otherwise reached.

    Content Scaling: More Reach with Less Effort

    AI helps teams produce more content without significantly increasing the workload. Instead of starting from scratch every time, marketers can repurpose existing content into multiple formats. One blog post can quickly become an X thread or a video script for Snapchat.

    For large companies, this opens up opportunities to enter new markets. AI tools can translate content in minutes, simplifying the adaptation of campaigns for different languages and regions without a separate production cycle for each. Small teams feel this no less.

    Полный цикл видеопродакшн: как ИИ-инструменты меняют создание контента к 2026 году — illustration 2

    When asked how AI helps her do more as a “one-person team,” Hensley replies: “THAT is the right question. Since many social media managers work alone, having AI to help with drafting and repurposing content is crucial… With AI, I can turn tedious, time-consuming tasks into quick solutions.”

    Platform Optimization: Improving Visibility

    Similar to Google and other search engines, social platforms have their own SEO rules. If you’re just learning to optimize content, AI tools can help. They suggest keywords, hashtags, and caption structures that improve the display of your content in feeds and search results. The result is posts that are easier for the right people to find.

    AI Tools for Content Creation: A Detailed Overview

    The best AI tools for content creation help social media specialists brainstorm, generate text, develop visuals, and edit videos in minutes. We’ve grouped them by category so you can jump to the one that matches your needs.

    AI for Text Writing and Copywriting

    These tools handle drafting, editing, repurposing, and maintaining brand tone. They are the foundation of most content creation workflows.

    Hootsuite: AI Assistant for Social Media

    • Features: Hootsuite’s AI capabilities are now integrated into Perch – the content, planning, and publishing app within Hootsuite Social OS. You input a prompt, and it transforms it into social media captions, post ideas, and content variations that can be scheduled without leaving the platform. What sets it apart from regular chatbots is context: the AI is trained on Hootsuite’s social media methodology, combining a powerful language model with content formulas based on over a decade of social marketing experience.
    • Best for: Teams that need to replace an SMM team or outsource social media content, and connect AI content creation with planning, publishing, analytics, and approvals in a single window.
    • Limitations: Designed specifically for social content, so it’s not suitable for creating long blog articles or technical documentation.
    • Pricing: Standard – $99/user/month, Advanced – $249/user/month. Enterprise – custom pricing. A free trial is available.

    ChatGPT: A Versatile Assistant

    • Features: Can create human-style content, including social media posts, blog articles, plans, and scripts. The latest models also generate images and support custom GPTs, allowing teams to create versions tailored to their brand’s context.
    • Best for: General drafting, brainstorming, and research support.
    • Limitations: Full drafts from scratch often sound generic, and factual or historical data always require verification against primary sources.
    • Pricing: There is a free tier. Plus – $20/month, Business – $20/user/month (when paid annually).

    Claude: For Working with Large Documents

    • Features: Helps generate ideas and create content using conversational prompts. It operates on a Constitutional AI system, designed to provide safer and more reliable responses.
    • Best for: Working with long documents, synthesizing research, and technical content.
    • Limitations: Not designed for end-to-end content production, and summaries still need human review before publication.
    • Pricing: There is a free tier. Pro – $20/month, Team – $25/user/month (when paid annually).
  • Jasper: for a consistent brand tone

    Copy.ai: for sales and marketing

    AI for image generation

    These tools work with visuals, from stylized concept art to ready-made templates.

    Midjourney: for stylized visuals

    Canva: for quick branded designs

    AI for video and audio

    Video remains the most resource-intensive format on social media. These two tools significantly reduce production time.

    Descript: for editing long videos

    InVideo: for creating short videos from text

    AI for presentations and design

    Compiling reports and presentations takes up a significant part of a marketer’s week. Beautiful.ai helps create polished slides quickly.

    Beautiful.ai: for creating presentations

    Free AI tools for content from Hootsuite

    Not every task justifies a subscription. Hootsuite offers free AI content creation tools that you can use right now, without signing up. Here are three of them worth bookmarking.

    Hootsuite also offers a range of other free generators, each with its own free plan and no sign-up required: Instagram Post Idea Generator, TikTok Post Idea Generator, Facebook Post Idea Generator, LinkedIn Post Idea Generator.

    Limitations of AI in Content Creation: What You Need to Know

    The main limitation of AI in content creation is that these tools work with existing information. This means they cannot reliably produce up-to-date research, original ideas, or genuine creative judgment. Knowing the boundaries of AI makes it useful, not risky. Here are five limitations to consider:

    1. Lack of up-to-date research: AI cannot always provide the latest data.
    2. Lack of expert opinions: AI is not an expert and cannot offer personal insights.
    3. Limited understanding of current trends: AI may lag behind the freshest trends and demographics.
    4. Lack of fresh case studies: AI is not always capable of providing current industry examples.
    5. Lack of creative judgment: AI cannot offer genuine creative judgment.