Tag: ad tech

  • AI Content Sites: A New Threat to the Advertising Market and Business

    AI Content Sites: A New Threat to the Advertising Market and Business

    In the world of digital advertising, a new “headache” is emerging for businesses – the rapid growth of websites filled with low-quality AI-generated content (AI Slop Sites). These resources, disguised as ordinary platforms, pose a serious threat to legitimate market players and can jeopardize brand reputation. How to choose a contractor and avoid becoming a victim of fraudsters when placing ads on such resources? Read more about this below.

    Introduction: The Rise of AI Sites and Challenges for Ad Tech

    In the world of digital advertising, a new “headache” is emerging for businesses – the rapid growth of websites filled with low-quality content, generated by artificial intelligence (AI Slop Sites). These resources, disguised as ordinary platforms, pose a serious threat to legitimate market players and can jeopardize brand reputation. How to choose a contractor and avoid becoming a victim of fraudsters when placing ads on such resources? Read more about this below.

    DecryptAds Research: The Scale of the Problem and “Risky Geos”

    According to DecryptAds research, the number of websites using AI-generated content is growing exponentially. Initially, the analysis was conducted on examples of websites with culinary recipes, but similar schemes are used for news aggregators, automotive, anime, and gaming forums.

    It’s breathtaking to realize that thousands of such resources are already integrated into ad networks.

    “The idea that US citizens, including potentially government officials, could be accessing these sites, their data could be collected by ad tech, and potentially they could be targeted by malicious ad schemes, raises serious cybersecurity concerns,” said Zach Edwards, co-founder and head of product and research at DecryptAds.

    DecryptAds found that monetization of such resources is often carried out through SSPs (Sell-Side Platforms), which work with advertising partners from so-called “risky geos”. These include countries associated with high levels of cybercrime or having strained relations with the US, such as Russia, China, Cyprus, Turkey, and the UAE. This creates additional risks for businesses.

    How do AI sites deceive advertising systems?

    These resources use various tactics to bypass moderation systems and maximize ad impressions:

    • Human Content Mimicry: Sites create the appearance of real human authorship using AI-generated avatars, stock images, or even altered photos of celebrities like Emily Blunt.
    • Violation of Google’s Rules: New Google Search rules, effective this month, explicitly state: “Fabricating creator profiles (e.g., using AI-generated photos, fictitious names, or false credentials to make content appear as if it was written by human experts) is a form of deception. Any form of deception makes a page untrustworthy to both users and our automated quality systems, and is a signal of a low-quality page.” However, some SSPs believe that these rules apply only to Google’s search business and do not extend to Google Ads.
    • Manipulation of Viewability Metrics: Sites are literally “stuffed” with ad units positioned to artificially inflate viewability metrics, but offering questionable value to the advertiser. This is similar to the situation with MFA (Made for Advertising) sites.
    • Content Copying and “Uniquification”: They duplicate viral trends or copy popular pages from other sites, creating “almost identical” versions that clearly haven’t been human-vetted.

    Problems of Detection and Accountability

    One of the main problems is the difficulty in identifying such resources. Networks of AI sites are designed to look as natural as possible. DecryptAds’ research identified over 2,100 such sites that have infiltrated the programmatic advertising chain through convoluted reseller relationships.

    SSP Responsibility: Zach Edwards emphasizes that SSPs are not always directly to blame. The complexity of the programmatic chain allows unscrupulous operators to hide. Nevertheless, this raises the question of the need for more thorough vetting of publishers when connecting to platforms.

    Сайты с AI-контентом: новая угроза для рекламного рынка и бизнеса — illustration 2

    Market Player Reactions

    • HBAgency: This SSP, according to DecryptAds, monetizes 1,631 of the 2,116 detected AI sites. A representative from HBAgency stated that the company thoroughly vets publishers and also uses independent third-party providers to combat fraud. HBAgency does not operate in sanctioned countries such as Russia, Belarus, Iran, and North Korea.
  • MonetizeMore: This SSP was observed monetizing 11 AI sites. The company’s CEO, Kean Graham, stated that they do not place ads on these resources and are conducting an internal review to identify and deactivate sites that do not meet their standards.
  • Ezoic: This SSP, which, according to DecryptAds, monetizes 407 AI sites, disputes the idea that AI authorship automatically makes content low-quality. The company claims to evaluate content based on quality and usefulness, not on how it was created, rejecting over 98% of site applications.
  • Mintegral: This ad tech provider, based in China, denied direct ad placement on the mentioned site dailytastekitchen.com and noted that the company’s geographical location should not be a basis for generalized assumptions about data security.

How to Protect Your Business: Contractor Selection Criteria

For businesses aiming for effective comprehensive promotion through short videos and outsourcing content for social media, it is crucial to carefully select a contractor. Here is a checklist to help you avoid “headaches” and financial losses:

  1. Transparency: Demand full transparency regarding the platforms where your ads will be placed.
  2. Check ads.txt and sellers.json: These files, though imperfect, are the only public tool for verifying relationships between publishers and ad tech vendors.
  3. Contractor Reputation: Choose companies with a proven reputation and positive reviews. Ask about their methods for combating fraud and low-quality traffic.
  4. Compliance with Google Standards: Ensure your partner adheres to Google’s new guidelines for content quality and authorship.
  5. Traffic Audit: Request reports on traffic sources and their quality. Use third-party tools for auditing.
  6. Geographical Restrictions: Discuss with the contractor the possibility of excluding “risky geos” from your ad targeting.
  7. Content Uniqueness: Prioritize partners who value uniqueness and the creation of original content, rather than just repurposing or AI-generated materials.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are “AI Slop Sites”?

“AI Slop Sites” are websites whose content is primarily generated by artificial intelligence, often of low quality, and which are used to deceive advertising systems for profit.

Why do “risky geos” pose a threat?

“Risky geos” are countries associated with high levels of cybercrime, a lack of data transparency, or strained relations with other states, which increases cybersecurity and data privacy risks.

How Google Fights AI Sites?

Google has updated its guidelines, stating that fabricating creator profiles (e.g., using AI-generated avatars) is a form of deception and indicates low page quality, leading to a drop in search rankings.

Should you order everything from one place?

Yes, ordering everything from one place from a reliable partner who offers full-cycle video production turnkey and SMM team replacement can significantly save your budget and nerves. The main thing is to carefully choose such a partner, using the above criteria.

Conclusion: The Importance of Vigilance and a Strategic Approach

The growth of AI sites is not just a technical problem; it’s a challenge for the entire advertising industry. For businesses that aim to order a banner, editing, and posting, the key is not only effectiveness but also the security of advertising campaigns. In conditions where AI or real clipping become a matter of choice, and comparing repurposing and shooting from scratch comes to the forefront, a strategic approach to partner selection is necessary. Only vigilance, demanding transparency, and focusing on proven methods will allow you to avoid pitfalls and effectively develop your brand. Do not let mass posting quality criteria become an empty sound. Protect your budget and reputation!

  • Google’s Ad Business Will Stand: Court Rejects Asset Split

    Google’s Ad Business Will Stand: Court Rejects Asset Split

    A U.S. federal court has ruled that Google will not have to break up its advertising business, despite the company being declared a monopolist in April. Judge Leonie Brinkema rejected the Department of Justice’s demand to sell the AdX ad exchange and, potentially, the DFP ad server, both part of Google Ad Manager (GAM). This decision calls into question the ability of regulators to rein in giants like Google.

    Why did Google avoid a breakup of its advertising empire?

    Judge Brinkema found that a forced breakup of Google’s business could cause more harm to publishers than current anti-competitive practices. She pointed to potential negative consequences for small publishers who use DFP for free. Additionally, the acquisition of AdX by another party (e.g., Microsoft) could create new complexities.

    Google’s proposed measures and their impact

    Google had previously proposed a number of measures to enhance competition:

    • Providing competitors with real-time bid data for display advertising sold through AdX.
    • Abolishing “Unified Pricing Rules” and allowing publishers to set different minimum prices for individual bidders in GAM.
    • Refraining from using “first-look” and “last-look” privileges to adjust its bids. Google claims it stopped this practice several years ago.

    “What is a web publisher to do if they want to use a different ad server but still get demand from Google buyers?” asks Jay Friedman, co-founder of CartographAI and former CEO of Goodway Group.

    Market and expert reaction to the court’s decision

    While many Google critics are disappointed, some ad industry players are willing to see how the proposed measures will play out. For example, PubMatic, an AdX competitor, stated: “We expect the court’s adoption of behavioral remedies to create a level playing field for all market participants. The court’s focus on behavioral remedies will likely provide a faster path to addressing the current competitive harm from Google’s unlawful monopoly.”

    Behavioral remedies versus full divestiture: arguments from both sides

    The Department of Justice insisted that forced divestiture would be a “cleaner and less risky solution,” expressing distrust in Google’s ability to comply with prescribed behavioral measures. However, Google’s lawyers countered that “distrust is not a lever to circumvent established antitrust principles.”

    Previous rulings and the future of Big Tech regulation

    This is not the first time Google has been found to be a monopolist but avoided a breakup. In August 2024, Judge Amit Mehta found Google’s monopoly in online search but did not force the sale of Chrome or Android. Instead, Google was ordered to share search data with competitors.

    Google's Ad Business Will Stand: Court Rejects Asset Split — illustration 2

    Such decisions make ad industry insiders doubt the ability of regulators to deal with Big Tech. One former media buyer anonymously remarked that even “trust-buster” Theodore Roosevelt would be astonished by the lack of courage in the judiciary today.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is Google Ad Manager (GAM)?

    Google Ad Manager (GAM) is an integrated ad management platform that combines the AdX ad exchange and the DFP ad server. It allows publishers to sell ad space and advertisers to buy it.

    Why did the U.S. Department of Justice want to break up Google?

    The U.S. Department of Justice accused Google of monopolizing the ad tech market and insisted on breaking up the company to restore competition and prevent anti-competitive practices.

    What behavioral measures did Google agree to take?

    Google agreed to a number of measures, including providing bid data to competitors, abolishing “Unified Pricing Rules” for publishers, and refraining from “first-look” and “last-look” privileges in bidding.

    Conclusion: pennies for a million or millions for pennies?

    So, banner advertising in video remains a battleground where Google is currently holding its ground. For us, arbitrageurs, this means one thing: CPM cheaper than 50 rubles in Shorts, Reels, and TikTok is still possible. Don’t wait for these “behavioral measures” to level the playing field. While the court deliberates, competition, however skewed, offers loopholes. Continue to test hypotheses, seek cheap reach, and scale mass reach for pennies. And remember, real math is always on our side if we know how to calculate and act quickly while the “big guys” are sorting things out in court. Forget about bloggers and their million-dollar price tags – buying reach without creating a video through programmatic platforms is our path to profit. Learn how to set up your first campaign and start earning right now!